Re: [dwm] How many tags do I use?

From: Anselm R. Garbe <>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 18:30:26 +0100

On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 05:04:11PM +0100, Sander van Dijk wrote:
> On 11/22/06, Anselm R. Garbe <> wrote:
> >Actually my favorit 'solution' to this problem would be,
> >dropping the weights at all and don't touching the global client
> >order. This seems to be more predictable (it also was the case
> >until 0.9 afair). Though there are corner-cases as well, because
> >zooming a multi-tagged client will zoom it in all tags it is
> >tagged - when viewed. But to me this seems more natural after
> >all.
> >
> >Actually I pushed this thing, it removes 40 lines, check hg tip
> >if you like it ;)
> I think that's indeed more predictable. Also, let's not forget that
> tags != workspaces. Caching views wouldn't be the way to go I believe.

I agree, hg tip feels much better compared to dwm-2.2's
reorder()'ed tiling (besides this, it uses lesser CPU cycles).


 Anselm R. Garbe >< >< GPG key: 0D73F361
Received on Wed Nov 22 2006 - 18:30:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 14:32:40 UTC