Re: [dwm] uriel sez the default config is retarded

From: Sander van Dijk <>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 10:48:26 +0100

On 2/9/07, Anselm R. Garbe <> wrote:
> So out of curiosity, I ask, who uses the default config? And if
> not, what changes do you make (you can diff the default config
> to mine, I use dmenu and some different shortcuts).
> Maybe it would be time to rethink some values of the default
> config, esp. some shortcuts?
> 1. You stick with default config?
> 2. You basically stick with default config, but
> a) use different colors/font
> b) use dmenu
> c) use some different shortcuts
> d) use more rules
> 3. You use totally different shortcuts?
> 4. You use totally different config?
> Thanks for any pointers.


2a, 2b, 2c (I don't change any shortcuts, just add some for progs I
use very often), 2d (I have some more apps that I want to float by
Basically I think that the default config is pretty good, it doesn't
assume any non-standard apps on the user's box and has pretty simple
I have no idea exactly what would be so "retarded" about the default config.

Greetings, Sander
Received on Fri Feb 09 2007 - 10:48:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 14:36:07 UTC