Re: [dwm] status

From: Tuncer Ayaz <tuncer.ayaz_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 22:34:31 +0200

On 7/11/07, Tuncer Ayaz <tuncer.ayaz_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/11/07, Tuncer Ayaz <tuncer.ayaz_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 7/11/07, Anselm R. Garbe <arg_AT_suckless.org> wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> > Anselm, if you need more info, you could take a look at resources like
> > the GPL licensed Litestep code or bb4win or Geoshell. Litestep has
> > the best systray support I know which is even better than
> > explorer.exe's own implementation (NT 5.1 that is). OK, it may be that some
> > mysterious ill-behaving app does only work the explorer.exe systray but
> > my current Litestep configuration is much more stable and forgiving when
> > it comes to systray support.
>
> Sources for Litestep (it's C++)
> http://www.lsdev.org/viewcvs/
>
> If you want to read ANSI C instead and can live with the systray code
> being just a little bit less tuned and older than the current Litestep
> one see the ANSI C sources in PureLS
> http://www.purels.net/binaries/purels0401src.zip
>
> Chris 'jugg' Rempel is the last active PureLS dev and is now
> mainly working on Litestep after many years of maintaining
> PureLS which is a continuation of the original C codebase
> of Litestep before they started using C++ many years ago.
> http://www.enderboi.com/ of ScummVM fame also worked
> on PureLS back in the day.
>
> sources for Litestep modules - aka plugins
> http://www.ls-universe.info/page.php?4
>
> <snip>

oh, and for the record 'enderboi' once ported PureLS to the
X Window System but that project got lost as he lost the sources
in some data loss situation caused by a harddisk problem or
something similar which I'm not 100% sure about.
Received on Wed Jul 11 2007 - 22:34:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 14:45:58 UTC