Re: [dwm] Thinking about tags

From: Antoni Grzymała <antoni_AT_chopin.edu.pl>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 19:52:27 +0200

On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 19:12:26 +0200, Anselm R. Garbe <arg_AT_suckless.org>
wrote:

>> I like the consistency as it stands - ie. I don't need to edit my
>> keybindings if I change my tag names - access to my tags remains
>> consistent. Not that I change my tags often, but I don't see an
>> advantage to having to edit them in 4 extra places (having said that, I
>> admit that I would need to edit them in all my rules anyway, so maybe
>> having to edit them in the keybindings is no great hardship)
>
> Ok, that is a good point to think about.

I think this is a very important point. Please keep the numbering. I also
think that having the tag names in one place (instead of four) makes
modyfying config.h less error prone.

On the other hand I can imagine using defines in config.h for that as in
#define TAG_0 www, then view(TAG_0). Maybe this is another way to approach
the problem.

Best,

[a]

-- 
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
Received on Wed Aug 15 2007 - 19:53:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 14:49:48 UTC