Re: [dwm] idxoftag

From: Stefano Soffia <stefano.soffia_AT_studenti.unipr.it>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 11:17:53 +0200

On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 10:26:38AM +0200, Enno Gottox Boland wrote:
> This heavy usage of defines and macros makes the sourcecode more
> weird. ntags for example should be renamed to NTAGS to make it more
> clear that it's a macro. Same at index_to_tag. But nevertheless I
> dislike this solution. It fucks up the source.

I know that the solution provided by this patch is quite dirty. However, my
intention was to show that the use of idxoftag can be avoided; certainly
exist cleaner solutions.

Gingioerge
Received on Mon Oct 22 2007 - 11:13:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 15:01:32 UTC