Re: [dwm] maximize problem

From: Anselm R. Garbe <arg_AT_suckless.org>
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 13:20:47 +0100

On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 11:13:42AM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 11:04:24AM +0100, pancake wrote:
> > I find quite anoying the maximize command. Because allows you to
> > hide windows to the user. I don't know if the right solution for this
> > would be to make maximize act as monocle, or avoid changing the
> > focus of the maximized client for the current tag, or making the
> > maximized flag be inheritable for the following created/switched
> > clients.
> >
> > You can achieve this problem by:
> > - open two windows
> > - maximize()
> > - nextclient()
> > (focused client is hidden for the user)
>
> I noticed the same, but this only happens because floating
> clients are kept always on top, which is good -- and all other
> clients are tiled somehow.
>
> This would happen with any manually maximized floating as well,
> so I see no real good solution for this. What do others think?

I think it might make some sense to simplify the whole
maximization concept, there are certain conditials in the
current implementation. I believe having an unrevertable
maximize-function for floating clients only is totally ok, since
we have togglefloating() in the code. If someone really needs to
maximize a tiled client, toggle it floating and maximize it. If
you want to undo this, togglefloating() again. Assume this
change happen until 4.8.

Regards,

-- 
 Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
Received on Sun Dec 09 2007 - 13:20:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 15:10:13 UTC