Re: [dwm] Current tagging/static Rule options?

From: Sander van Dijk <a.h.vandijk_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 08:16:41 +0200

On 6/16/08, Sidney Amani <seed95_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
>> 1 << n means, the n-th tag is assigne
> Actually "1 << 8" assign the 9th tag and "1 << 0" the first one.
>
> I guess people working with big endian architectures have to shift on
> the right with "1 >> 8", don't they?

No, they don't.
Received on Mon Jun 16 2008 - 08:16:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 15:49:53 UTC