Re: [dwm] unsigned int or size_t

From: Anselm R Garbe <garbeam_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 09:08:04 +0100

Hi,

the favor for unsigned int vs size_t is based on consistency
throughout the code and the fact, that we don't exceed any boundaries
of the unsigned int space.

Kind regards,
Anselm

2008/7/30 Filippo Erik Negroni <f.e.negroni_AT_googlemail.com>:
> Hi All,
>
> I noticed the code in dwm uses unsigned int for positive counters of
> memory arrays instead of size_t.
> Is there a particular reason you don't use size_t in order to convey
> that you are using that quantity as a counter of memory space?
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Filippo
Received on Thu Jul 31 2008 - 08:08:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Jul 31 2008 - 08:12:05 UTC