Re: [dwm] Re: dwm-5.4 stdin; cycle tags

Zitat - James Turner * Sa Dez 13 2008 um 18:43 -

> On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 06:09:11PM +0100, henry atting wrote:
>> Zitat - Anselm R Garbe * Sa Dez 13 2008 um 17:54 -
>>
>> > 2008/12/13 henry atting <nspm_01_AT_literaturlatenight.de>:
>> >>> 2008/12/13 henry atting <nspm_01_AT_literaturlatenight.de>:
>> >>> The tagging approach didn't change between 5.2 and 5.4, so I assume
>> >>> it's just a matter of making the 5.2 patch applying to the 5.4
>> >>> codebase.
>> >>
>> >> Mmh, I am not very familiar with patching, I did it this way:
>> >>
>> >> ,----
>> >> | do! patch -p1 < dwm-5.2-arrownav.diff
>> >> | missing header for unified diff at line 3 of patch
>> >> | can't find file to patch at input line 3
>> >> | Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
>> >> | The text leading up to this was:
>> >> | --------------------------
>> >> | |--- config.def.h Tue Sep 9 15:46:17 2008
>> >> | |+++ config.def.h Tue Nov 18 19:26:53 2008
>> >> | --------------------------
>> >> | File to patch: config.def.h
>> >> | patching file config.def.h
>> >> | Hunk #1 succeeded at 62 (offset 1 line).
>> >> | missing header for unified diff at line 14 of patch
>> >> | can't find file to patch at input line 14
>> >> | Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
>> >> | The text leading up to this was:
>> >> | --------------------------
>> >> | |--- dwm.c Tue Sep 9 15:46:17 2008
>> >> | |+++ dwm.c Tue Nov 18 19:31:55 2008
>> >> | --------------------------
>> >> | File to patch: dwm.c
>> >> | patching file dwm.c
>> >> | Hunk #1 succeeded at 197 (offset -1 lines).
>> >> | Hunk #2 FAILED at 1668.
>> >> | 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file dwm.c.rej
>> >> `----
>> >
>> > Well as I said, you will need to patch it manually, since the lines
>> > have changed and the heuristic approach supported by patch(1) isn't
>> > succeeding either.
>> >
>> > Kind regards,
>> > --Anselm
>>
>> I see, great thanks
>> henry
>
> Henry,
>
> Attached is an updated arrownav patch [0] that should apply to dwm tip
> cleanly.
>
> [0] http://bsdgroup.org/files/dwm-5.4-arrownav.diff

Patching works without problems but I get this warnings:

        dwm.c:1640: warning: ‘viewnext’ defined but not used
        dwm.c:1657: warning: ‘viewprevious’ defined but not used

And, what should I say, it *is* not used ;)

henry
Received on Sat Dec 13 2008 - 18:26:36 UTC