Re: [dwm] dwm-5.3

From: Szabolcs Nagy <nszabolcs_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 21:12:38 +0100

On 12/13/08, James Turner <james_AT_bsdgroup.org> wrote:
> man signal on OpenBSD also states to #include <signal.h>, it's just
> signal.h includes sys/signal.h and for the function used by dwm
> sys/signal.h is all that is required on OpenBSD. I don't run any other
> systems so if signal.h is more portable then go with it.

for the record:

<signal.h> is in c89, c99 and various unix/posix standards
<sys/signal.h> is not

http://www.unix.org/version3/apis/headers.html
Received on Sun Dec 14 2008 - 20:12:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Dec 14 2008 - 20:24:03 UTC