Re: [dwm] dwm's future

From: Martin Oppegaard <martin_AT_deathaven.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:12:02 +0200

On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 02:08:20PM +0200, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 01:05:40PM +0200, Martin Oppegaard wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 12:58:23PM +0200, Preben Randhol wrote:
> > > On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:45:35 +0200
> > > Martin Oppegaard <martin_AT_deathaven.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 10:35:12AM +0200, Preben Randhol wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:25:55 +0200
> > > > > Martin Oppegaard <martin_AT_deathaven.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I like free software.
> > > > >
> > > > > But not GPL?
> > > > >
> > > > It's just another lock in which is getting too big.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Sure, if you want to make proprietary software...
> > >
> > If you want to be free from wacko organisations.
>
> Are you sure, you know what you are talking about? At least all people I
> know from Free Software Foundation Europe are quite friendly and really care
> about Free Software and fight actively against proprietary software. They
> are by no means wackos.

Of course they are! I'm just being sceptical.

>
> But as mentioned this discussion could go on and on without a result.
>
> > > --
> > > Preben Randhol
>
> Regards,
> Matthias-Christian
>
Received on Wed Apr 29 2009 - 14:12:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Apr 29 2009 - 14:24:04 UTC