Re: [hackers] [sbase] Double NARGS || sin

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Roberto E. Vargas Caballero <k0ga_AT_shike2.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 12:58:00 +0100

> Consider, these numbers are in bytes not the # of arguments.

Uhmmm, I gather it now. I saw only the diff and I interpreted it
incorrectly. Sorry for the noise.

-- 
Roberto E. Vargas Caballero

Received on Thu Jan 16 2014 - 12:58:00 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Dimitris Papastamos: "Re: [hackers] [sbase] Double NARGS || sin"
Previous message: git_AT_suckless.org: "[hackers] [sbase] No need to dynamically allocate *cmd[] || sin"
In reply to: Dimitris Papastamos: "Re: [hackers] [sbase] Double NARGS || sin"
Next in thread: Dimitris Papastamos: "Re: [hackers] [sbase] Double NARGS || sin"
Reply: Dimitris Papastamos: "Re: [hackers] [sbase] Double NARGS || sin"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Thu Jan 16 2014 - 13:00:14 CET