Re: [hackers] [ubase] Style fix for respawn || sin

From: FRIGN <>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 12:46:00 +0200

On Fri, 18 Apr 2014 11:43:19 +0100
sin <> wrote:

> Matter of taste and makes it a bit more explicit to me that
> argv is an array of pointers to chars (and I can treat them as such).
> Generally if it was char **p, then depending on the situation p++ might
> have been invalid, where as char *p[] you would probably expect that
> you can access p[0], p[1] up to a certain number of them.

Well, that's a point!
Thanks for clearing that up.

Maybe we should land a patch on the big bases (ubase, sbase) to make
this uniform.



Received on Fri Apr 18 2014 - 12:46:00 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Apr 18 2014 - 12:48:23 CEST