Re: [hackers] [sbase][patch] find: empty line means no for -ok

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Roberto E. Vargas Caballero <k0ga_AT_shike2.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 08:30:14 +0200

Hi,

> Yes I most certainly did, this is what I get for submitting patches
> without testing. The shame. New patch attached, also protects against
> the glibc bug causing fgetc to hang after EOF was received.

And what about if we send a patch to glibc instead?

Regards,
Received on Fri Jun 19 2015 - 08:30:14 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Anselm R Garbe: "Re: [hackers] [9base][patch] cal: Bprint format specifier"
Previous message: Evan Gates: "Re: [hackers] [sbase][patch] find: empty line means no for -ok"
In reply to: Evan Gates: "Re: [hackers] [sbase][patch] find: empty line means no for -ok"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Jun 19 2015 - 08:36:10 CEST