Re: [hackers] [sbase][PATCH v2.1] ls: fix segfault when timestamp is out of range for struct tm

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Quentin Rameau <quinq_AT_fifth.space>
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2016 19:52:47 +0200

Looks fine for me.

> + snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%lli", (long
Could you use d instead of i, just to be consistant with the rest of
sbase?
Thanks!
Received on Sun Mar 27 2016 - 19:52:47 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Mattias Andrée: "[hackers] [sbase][PATCH v2.2] ls: fix segfault when timestamp is out of range for struct tm"
Previous message: Mattias Andrée: "[hackers] [sbase][PATCH v2.1] ls: fix segfault when timestamp is out of range for struct tm"
In reply to: Mattias Andrée: "[hackers] [sbase][PATCH v2.1] ls: fix segfault when timestamp is out of range for struct tm"
Next in thread: Mattias Andrée: "[hackers] [sbase][PATCH v2.2] ls: fix segfault when timestamp is out of range for struct tm"
Reply: Mattias Andrée: "[hackers] [sbase][PATCH v2.2] ls: fix segfault when timestamp is out of range for struct tm"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sun Mar 27 2016 - 20:00:19 CEST