Re: [hackers] [sbase] [PATCH 0/6] Various bug fixes

From: Marc Collin <marc.collin7_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 16:37:55 -0300

>I think sbase
>could use some sort of test suite so we could check for correct
>behavior and accidental regressions.

There's base-util-tests by maandree.
https://github.com/maandree/base-util-tests



On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 10:56 PM, Michael Forney <mforney_AT_mforney.org> wrote:
> Hopefully others can check my logic on these. It's very easy to
> introduce new bugs accidentally by fixing others. I think sbase
> could use some sort of test suite so we could check for correct
> behavior and accidental regressions.
>
> Michael Forney (6):
> Revert "Fix showing directories when -R flag is set in ls(1)"
> Revert "ls: only display directory headers when more than one
> directory is specified"
> ls: Don't show directory name with single directory operand
> ls: Simplify some logic
> sort: Fix line comparison when col buffer contains data from longer
> line
> linecmp: Handle NUL bytes properly
>
> libutil/linecmp.c | 11 ++---------
> ls.c | 23 ++++++++++++-----------
> sort.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.6.2
>
>
Received on Tue May 17 2016 - 21:37:55 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue May 17 2016 - 21:48:25 CEST