Re: [hackers] Re: [ii] [GIGA-patchset] Hiltjo-branch

From: Hiltjo Posthuma <hiltjo_AT_codemadness.org>
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2016 11:26:21 +0200

On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 10:47:09PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> * Hiltjo Posthuma <hiltjo_AT_codemadness.org> [2016-05-10 01:14]:
> > On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 7:52 PM, Nico Golde <nico_AT_ngolde.de> wrote:
> [...]
> > > To be honest I was a little in shock when I saw this. Some of this would have
> > > been nice to see beforehand, I see some of the patches date back until 2014.
> > > So bear with me when it comes to integrating this, but I'll try to be quick...
> > > If I don't make it, that may as well be a good chance to hand of maintenance
> > > of the project. I guess I've been pretty inactive for too long.
> > >
> >
> > It is my fault, it was my intention to send the patches upstream, but
> > I sat on the patches too long and over time it was harder for me to
> > merge the changes back. Take your time to review it and don't hesitate
> > to contact me (via mail or IRC). I think some of the patches attached
> > don't apply cleanly anymore, but I can help to fix them up later.
>
> Sorry I still didn't get to this. Just wanted to send this as a sign that I
> didn't forget. I'm just in the middle of relocating...
>

Hey,

Is there still interest in merging the changes back into ii? I understand if
the changeset is too large, it can be split up.

There is a brief summary of the changes made (1.8 section):
https://git.codemadness.org/ii/file/CHANGES.html

Let me know if it sucks or not.

-- 
Kind regards,
Hiltjo
Received on Sun Sep 25 2016 - 11:26:21 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sun Sep 25 2016 - 11:36:15 CEST