Re: [hackers] [dwm][PATCH] ColBorder has been moved to the enum with ColFg and ColBg.

From: Silvan Jegen <>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 09:06:56 +0100

Dear Laslo

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 10:39 PM, Laslo Hunhold <> wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 22:17:25 +0100
> Silvan Jegen <> wrote:
> Dear Silvan,
>> I see, thanks!
>> Still sounds to me like having patches as attachments just causes me
>> to have to change my default configuration though.
>> What is the advantage of attaching the patches instead of just sending
>> them inline, I wonder.
> because not everyone uses Mutt. Having dedicated attachments is
> consistent when you send multiple patches, makes it easier to save them
> somewhere for people who use "normal" mail-clients (no offense against
> mutt of course).

I am sure they work great with nmh too! :P

> The most prominent reason I see though is that when people browse the
> mailing list archives of, it's pretty much impossible to
> extract the patch files from the archived messages, however it is
> trivial when they are attachments.

That is a good point. I have actually been quite frustrated with not
being able to download raw emails from mailing lists for a while now.
I assume the common email archivers don't allow that because it would
make it too easy to harvest email addresses? Not sure.


Received on Fri Mar 16 2018 - 09:06:56 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Mar 16 2018 - 09:12:32 CET