Re: [hackers] [dwm] [PATCH] add a comment to clarify a potential overflow of ltsymbol

From: Hiltjo Posthuma <hiltjo_AT_codemadness.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 18:49:38 +0100

On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 05:28:43PM +0000, Tom Schwindl wrote:
> Hi Hiltjo,
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I think it is too verbose and don't think the comment is neccesary.
> >
>
> I can understand the verbosity part, but that's something I can change.
> My point here was more that bug reports get posted to the ML and I even
> get them in private or from people I know in person. So I think a comment,
> as you, yourself suggested, might be helpful.
> A simple "Hey, if you're exceeding 16 bytes we cannot guarantee for anything"
> would be enough (not in that tone, of course) for me.
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Tom Schwindl
>
> > --
> > Kind regards,
> > Hiltjo
>
>
>

NO

-- 
Kind regards,
Hiltjo
Received on Wed Feb 15 2023 - 18:49:38 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Feb 15 2023 - 19:00:41 CET