Re: [hackers] [sbase][PATCH] od: fix for -t option

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: noneofyourbusiness <noneofyourbusiness_AT_danwin1210.de>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2025 19:08:50 +0200

noneofyourbusiness_AT_danwin1210.de wrote:
> don't increment pointer in call to addtype
I think this would be more correct:
> don't increment pointer after call to addtype
Received on Tue Sep 30 2025 - 19:08:50 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: noneofyourbusiness: "Re: [hackers] [sbase][PATCH] od: fix for -t option"
Previous message: git_AT_suckless.org: "[hackers] [dwm] drw.c: drw_scm_free: call free inside || Hiltjo Posthuma"
Next in thread: noneofyourbusiness: "Re: [hackers] [sbase][PATCH] od: fix for -t option"
Maybe reply: noneofyourbusiness: "Re: [hackers] [sbase][PATCH] od: fix for -t option"
Maybe reply: Roberto E. Vargas Caballero: "Re: [hackers] [sbase][PATCH] od: fix for -t option"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Sep 30 2025 - 19:12:37 CEST