Re: [wmii] wmii-4 fs proposal/discussion

El 09/jun/2006 a las 11:01 -0300, Anselm me decía:
> On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 11:09:51AM -0300, Fernando Canizo wrote:
> > I don't get what you try to say with "negative", anyway i don't "hear"
> > you negative, i hear you like you have the real and only truth on gui
> > use. When in fact it's more a thing of taste. Why i'm "incorrect" and
> > you (or Uriel) are correct? Just cause you use the word "philosophy"
> > a lot?
> >
> > With the request i'm asking for, the users like you will not notice any
> > changes. And users like me or Anselm (no matter he don't like what i
> > proposed) will have a way to get a set of fixed tags, plus the set of
> > dinamically created/destroyed tags.
> >
> > I see this as the "best of both worlds".
> >
> > And remember: i'm viewing this from a practical point of view, in the
> > end we always will have to press keys.
>
> You can achieve what you want to simply hardcoding shortcuts to
> show up a specific static tag. The order in the bar shouldn't
> matter for that.

Yep. True.
But that's another ungeneral solution.

-- 
Fernando Canizo - http://www.lugmen.org.ar/~conan/
Ridículo como tarzán con medias