Re: [wmii] Preparations for 3.5

From: Suraj N. Kurapati <skurapat_AT_ucsc.edu>
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 10:35:26 -0800

Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> I think a 9P interface is too exeggerated for the
> purpose of a window manager. To keep the same flexibility but
> with a much simplier approach, you could think about defining a
> command interface which is read from stdin and special results
> written to stdout.

The technology used to implement the remote-control interface will
change (standard pipe instead of 9P). However, will the same level
of remote-control functionality be kept?

I don't want to have /less/ ability of manipulating clients, views,
etc. than before.
Received on Fri Nov 03 2006 - 19:54:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 16:16:35 UTC