On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Antoni Grzymala<antoni_AT_chopin.edu.pl> wrote:
> David Tweed dixit (2009-07-07, 16:58):
>> system, the "full" display-postscript compositing engine behind "full"
>> GNUstep and all those other "new" windowing systems that never
>> actually got anywhere near completion because the only thing one could
>> do with them in their current state was development.
>
> Hasn't this stuff ended up in OS X?
I'm not aware of that: I thought that all the quartz code was
developed internally by apple (possibly using the original NextStep
code) and didn't use any of the GNUstep "attempted reimplementation"
code. (To be clear: I'm not talking about the concepts developed by
NextStep being used elsewhere but the actual GNUstep codebase not
getting near completion in the above.) But I could be wrong about the
source code's ancestry.
-- cheers, dave tweed__________________________ computer vision reasearcher: david.tweed_AT_gmail.com "while having code so boring anyone can maintain it, use Python." -- attempted insult seen on slashdotReceived on Tue Jul 07 2009 - 16:19:41 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Jul 07 2009 - 16:24:01 UTC