> Not to mention the duplicty:
> - something is suckless (completely void of suck)
> - something does suck less (still some suck in it)
>
> These things are very different, and I think it's very, very hard to reach the first meaning
> I think option 2 is the commonly accepted one here, but meaning 1 sounds most natural to me.
>
> Dieter
>
>
Nothing is completely void of suck.
Received on Sat Jul 18 2009 - 12:35:44 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Jul 18 2009 - 12:48:01 UTC