Re: [dev] 9base-3

To me, the only difference is that unlike p9p, 9base does get packaged
into Debian. Aside from that I see little benefit. It is rather sad
that nobody packages p9p for Debian, but seems to be a lost battle
(and no, the building of the .debs is not the issue, the issue is that
a Debian developer has to do it and has to follow all the silly Debian
conventions and whatever which takes a lifetime master).

Peace

uriel

On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 12:50 AM, Charlie Kester<corky1951_AT_comcast.net> wrote:
> On Thu 06 Aug 2009 at 13:08:06 PDT Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I revived the 9base project which was asleep for nearly 3 years som
>> days ago and created a new version based on Russ' plan9port from
>> 20090731. You can download it from:
>>
>>  http://code.suckless.org/dl/tools/9base-3.tar.gz
>>
>> its project page can be found at:
>>
>>  http://tools.suckless.org/9base
>
> Help me understand the pro's and con's here.  Why/when should I use
> 9base rather than plan9port?
>
>
>
>
Received on Fri Aug 07 2009 - 20:00:48 UTC