On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 12:43 AM, Ammar James<lone.nomad_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 4:11 PM, hiro<23hiro_AT_googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> The only problem with Plan9 is that, from what I've heard, its
>>> pointless to run it without X (eg. using rio). I just find that
>>> inconceivable.
>>
>> What do you mean? I don't run it with X.
>>
>
> Really? Practically everyone on #plan9 (freenode) chewed me out
> because I didn't want to use Plan9 with X (rio, wmii, etc.)...
You are really confused, or can't tell sarcasm from honest statements.
X has only really run on Plan 9 for a year or so, and almost nobody
uses it, unless you want to run some crap linux software with
linuxemu.
uriel
> I wonder why... I'll revisit it tonight (or tomorrow night) if running
> Plan9 Xless is indeed possible.
>
>
Received on Sun Aug 30 2009 - 23:18:27 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Aug 30 2009 - 23:24:02 UTC