[2009-09-05 08:29] hessiess_AT_hessiess.com <hessiess_AT_hessiess.com>
>
> [...] HTML NEVER prints the same from two
> different viewers. Generally the point of systems like TeX is you can
> garentee that a document will always look the same, regardless of if it
> was typeset now or 10 years in the future.
I know, this is a goal of typesetting. But is it neccessary to be so?
Wouldn't it be better if the document looks different in different
environments? E.g. multi-column layout in print, but single-column on
screen. Or serifs on paper, but no serifs on screen. [0] also focuses
on this point.
[0] http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/anton/why-not-pdf.html
Don't get me wrong, I like the idea of documents that never change
it's style. So I can create them exactly as I want them to be ... but
is this primary an artistic approach, where instead content should
receive the focus?
The main question: Can I provide more addon-value for content delivery
with a fixed presentation layout, than a reader gets from the ability
to adjust the presentation layout to his personal needs?
I'm undecided.
meillo
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Sep 05 2009 - 08:24:01 UTC