Re: [dev] Talk about sane web browsers

2009/9/8 Donald Allen <donaldcallen_AT_gmail.com>:
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Anselm R Garbe<garbeam_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2009/9/8 Donald Allen <donaldcallen_AT_gmail.com>:
>>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 1:42 PM, markus schnalke<meillo_AT_marmaro.de> wrote:
>>>> [2009-09-08 01:16] Uriel <lost.goblin_AT_gmail.com>
>>>>> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 9:35 PM, markus schnalke<meillo_AT_marmaro.de> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Read my slides,
>>>>>
>>>>> I would read them, if they were written in the standard language used
>>>>> by the software industry (and the internet as a whole). People that
>>>>> write stuff in marginal historical languages for nationalistic or
>>>>> other barbaric reasons should not be surprised if their work is
>>>>> ignored.
>>>>
>>>> What do you mean? Probably not the source language (latex), or?
>>>>
>>>> The content is English. (I only talked in German, if this was
>>>> unclear.)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ... but maybe, better don't read them. I'm worried about you're
>>>> health.  ;-)
>>>
>>> I think your concern is appropriate. Why anyone puts up with Uriel's
>>> disgusting, offensive, childish rants is beyond me.  This discussion
>>> has sucked more, not less, and I am going to remove myself from this
>>> list.
>>
>> Don't take Uriels offenses too serious or personal, his attitude is
>> quite difficult sometimes and we had such climaxes several times
>> already...
>
> There was no personal offense; I haven't been part of the discussion,
> fortunately. But why do you bother responding to this guy at all?
> Anyone who deals with people as he does does not deserve a response.
> Responding to him continues the discussion, pollutes the list, and
> offends people like me who were brought up to have polite and civil
> discussions about issues, even controversial ones.

I understand your reasons. However some of us know Uriel and got used
to his social disabilities from time to time. If you aren't used to
them, ignore him ;) At the end of the day sometimes even such strange
discussions turned to be fruitful in the past.

Kind regards,
Anselm
Received on Tue Sep 08 2009 - 21:42:07 UTC