Re: [dev][dwm][OT] redundant thread; was broken gnome (even after reset) after usage of dwm 4.7

* Kris Maglione <maglione.k_AT_gmail.com> [2009-09-19 19:20]:
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 06:31:04PM +0200, Antoni Grzymala wrote:
>> Uriel dixit (2009-09-19, 14:19):
>>
>>> "broken gnome" is redundant.
>>
>> This comment was also redudant. Everyone knows you think that, so your
>> comment was implicit, everyone knew it before you actually sent it out,
>> by way of which the above is redundant. :)
>
> One should think the comment would be redundant for any person on this
> list.

The whole above branch of the thread is redundant, since everyone on the
list knew that uriel will make the comment, and that someone will respond
as above. Now, I sacrifice myself to be the one to -- redundantly --
summarise, and make the redundancy complete.

Or not? You never know ...

-- 
 cheers
 stanio_