Re: [dev] Question upgrading dwm

From: Uriel <lost.goblin_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:21:33 +0200

Funny, I was using three monitors years before Xinerama was even
invented, I wonder how was that possible?

Tuomov is right on this one, Xinerama sucks:
http://modeemi.fi/~tuomov/b/2008/the_downfall_of_x/

uriel

On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 4:49 PM, miles groman <miles.groman_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> Xinerama ++
>
> /me hugs his 2 monitors
>
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 7:58 AM, David Neu <david_AT_davidneu.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Anselm R Garbe <anselm_AT_garbe.us> wrote:
>>> Ah that explains a lot. You aren't using dwm-5.6.1, right? You are
>>> using dwm-5.6?
>>> The bug you were noticing was fixed in dwm-5.6.1. Not building with
>>> Xinerama support will do the trick on single head setups as well of
>>> course.
>>
>> Hi Anselm,
>>
>> No, actually I'm using dwm-5.6.1, which if recall correctly I grabbed
>> from the home page link,
>> http://dl.suckless.org/dwm/dwm-5.6.1.tar.gz. Let me know if there is
>> something I can try to track down what's going on.
>>
>>> What do others think about this proposal? No Xinerama support by default?
>> Or while it's not difficult to figure out, perhaps a line in README
>> indicating how to build without Xinerama.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> David
>>
>>
>
>
Received on Wed Sep 23 2009 - 15:21:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Sep 23 2009 - 15:24:02 UTC