The only reason XHTML did not replace HTML is because IE did not and
does not support it. It is no more geekier than HTML.
But whether XHTML was or will be adopted by the internet is irrelevent
to this discussion as it regards using XHTML for word processing.
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 6:44 PM, Anselm R Garbe <anselm_AT_garbe.us> wrote:
> 2009/10/18 Tor Aqissiaq <toraqissiaq_AT_googlemail.com>:
>> What is wrong with XHTML? Are you implying that HTML is superior?
>
> Only geeks bother to adopt it. XHTML adoption is around 0.1% of all
> web pages, and it is unlikely to take over the world. All browsers and
> the web trend travel towards HTML5 for quite some time, there is
> really no space left for XHTML...
>
> Kind regards,
> Anselm
>
>
Received on Sun Oct 18 2009 - 17:50:36 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Oct 18 2009 - 18:00:02 UTC