Re: [dev] (x)HTML-based office suite? (aka suckless word processing solution-2)

From: Uriel <lost.goblin_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:15:21 +0200

On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 7:35 PM, Anselm R Garbe <anselm_AT_garbe.us> wrote:
> 2009/10/18 Tor Aqissiaq <toraqissiaq_AT_googlemail.com>:
>> XHTML, parsed using an XML parser is very specifically defined and
>> does not look different in different browsers, but few people serve
>> XHTML documents with the application/xhtml+xml headers, because IE
>> refuses to parse XML. XHTML parsed as HTML + no better than HTML. I
>> already use XHTML for sending documents to my friends.
>
> XHTML is a sick child that will die soon.

And when it dies we can party to celebrate one more nail in the coffin of XML.

Good riddance!

uriel

> Kind regards,
> Anselm
>
>
Received on Mon Oct 19 2009 - 14:15:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Oct 19 2009 - 14:24:02 UTC