To attempt to bring it back on topic, here are my thoughts:
Any software that can't handle utf-8 should be replaced with software that
sucks less.
However, anything that can be done to make the source code for suckless
projects suck less (in regards to its interactions with software, some of
which may suck) is a Good Thing.
Since this change requires no real effort and can slightly improve its
interactions with other software, why not just do it?
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Kurt H Maier <karmaflux_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 3:00 PM, A.J. Gardner <aaron.j.gardner_AT_gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Then again, why bother appealing to copy "rights" and similar hooey in
> > the first place? I always consider it to be enough simply to appeal to
> > good sense, good manners, and social pressure to ensure credit is
> > given where credit is due. Something like "Notice: So-and-so created
> > this work. Do what you like with it, but don't claim you came up with
> > it 'cause that's lying. And nobody likes a liar. Thanks."
> >
> > Different strokes for different folks, I guess.
>
> Excuse me, this thread is clearly destined to turn into a character
> encoding flamewar, not a software licensing flamewar.
>
>
> --
> # Kurt H Maier
>
>
Received on Thu Oct 22 2009 - 20:17:19 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Oct 22 2009 - 20:24:02 UTC