Should do a 9p file server with some kind of cookie and session cache,
also precache.
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Claudio M. Alessi <smoppy_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 09:09:25AM -0700, Charlie Kester wrote:
>> It seems to me that the problems being discussed in this subthread arise
>> because the "browser" combines two very distinct concerns:
>>
>> - managing the http traffic to and from the website, which includes the
>> administrative details pertaining to the session
>>
>> - rendering the documents obtained from the website
>>
>> Perhaps we should be thinking about separating them?
> That's exactly what I was thinking about after reading the Anselm post. I'm
> pretty sure this is the way to go. We need a "core browser" which is just
> indipendent from the viewer. Well, it isn't right to call it "browser" but I
> don't find a better name ATM. Then you can use whatever tool you want to do
> each thing as you like, better and easily.
>
> Regards,
> Claudio M. Alessi.
>
> --
> JID: smoppy AT gmail.com
> WWW: http://cma.teroristi.org
>
>
Received on Fri Oct 23 2009 - 14:12:08 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Oct 23 2009 - 14:24:02 UTC