Re: [dev] [st] goals / non-goals for st?

From: Uriel <lost.goblin_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 02:30:02 +0100

On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Aled Gest <himselfe_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
>> People who support dumb things run the risk of mockery.  I'd rather
>> get burned for suggesting something stupid than have this list turn
>> into a politically-correct hugbox support forum for the criminally
>> inept.  If you don't like it, go hang out on another mailing list.
>
> Well if you really want me to make a point about how people who are
> needlessly belligerent on inappropriate threads are evidently
> incompetent at life, that's fine. I could have a field day nitpicking
> the psychology of people who overcompensate for their own inferiority
> by directing disproportionate aggression towards hapless randoms who
> dare to suggest naive ideas. I just think development threads are more
> productive when socially inept morons aren't derailing conversations
> with fruitless personal attacks. You understand the inherent pitfalls
> of fallacious behavior right?

You are learning well... the dark side of the force is strong with you.

(Ok, I suck at quoting Star Wars, whatever, it is a retarded film anyway ;P)

>> You want your terminal emulator to replace xmessage?  Really?
>
> No, I want a terminal emulator that can behave like a terminal
> emulator. Last time I checked xmessage wasn't a terminal emulator.

Then buy yourself a typewriter.

uriel
Received on Sat Oct 31 2009 - 01:30:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Oct 31 2009 - 01:36:09 UTC