On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 11:00:10PM +0000, Jacob Todd wrote:
>On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 07:20:54PM +0100, Uriel wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Anselm R Garbe <anselm_AT_garbe.us> wrote:
>> > 2009/11/4 Sven Guckes <maillist-wmi-announce_AT_guckes.net>:
>> >> [... snip]
>> > Should also work with ed:
>> >
>> > r !ls
>> > v/\.js d
>> > g//s/^/echo /
>> > w !sh
>> >
>> > Kind regards,
>> > Anselm
>>
>> More evidence that Unix software has not progressed much in the last
>> forty years.
>>
>> But I'm sure that in a few years they will try to present us this
>> stuff as "amazing gnome-edit magic".
>>
>>
>> uriel
>>
>No one uses ed (hopefully), so it doesn't really prove anything other than GNU
>and whoever else is maintaining an ed clone are stuck in the dark ages.
Clone? Don't be absurd. Heirloom, Plan 9, and most of the BSDs
still provide the original ed.
-- Kris Maglione Beauty is more important in computing than anywhere else in technology because software is so complicated. Beauty is the ultimate defence against complexity. --David GelernterReceived on Thu Nov 05 2009 - 07:32:30 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Nov 05 2009 - 07:36:01 UTC