Re: [dev] slock with non-system auth

From: anonymous <aim0shei_AT_lavabit.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 00:21:54 +0300

> If the program prints a expanation message and fails if it has read
> permission, then I'd agree with you.
>
Maybe just add chmod inside makefile's install rule?
Received on Mon Dec 28 2009 - 21:21:54 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Rob: "Re: [dev] simple portscanner"
Previous message: markus schnalke: "Re: [dev] slock with non-system auth"
In reply to: markus schnalke: "Re: [dev] slock with non-system auth"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Dec 28 2009 - 21:24:20 UTC