Re: [dev] stali and the shipped compilers

From: Anselm R Garbe <>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 10:26:29 +0000

2010/1/15 Jimmy Tang <>:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 09:42:02PM +0100, pancake wrote:
>> I would prefer to drop gcc, glibc and all the shit from gnu.
>> Tcc and dietlibc are usable solutions and maybe the code is not the best
>> one but at least is sane.
>> Current toolchain is just to get a working version. I know that anselm
>> is really busy these days, like me.. This is the reason why some of
>> those projects are a bit stopped.
> it would be interesting to see its outcome(s), has anyone looked at the
> packaging system for such a distribution? or will a bsd style tree of
> code/makefiles be adopted?

There is no need for a packaging system. Updates to the core stali
parts will mainly be binary diffs for executables, so you only replace
executables and potentially config files if needed. I see this as an
advantage btw -- this also supports the way that programs can
update/install themselves more easily.

Received on Fri Jan 15 2010 - 10:26:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Jan 15 2010 - 10:36:02 UTC