Re: [dev] [SLOCK] is not safe

On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 04:49:41PM +0100, Premysl Hruby wrote:
> [...]
> Not really, simply using 'startx & exit' instead of plain 'startx' is
> sufficient.
> [...]

Agreed, forgot about that one.

-- 
GCS/IT/M d- s+:- a-- C++ UL+++ US UB++ P+++ L+++ E--- W+ N+ o--
K- w--- ?O M-- ?V PS++ PE- Y++ PGP+++ t+ 5 X+ R tv b+++ DI+++
D+++ G+ e h! r y+
    Gregor Best