Re: [dev] [SLOCK] is not safe

From: Moritz Wilhelmy <crap_AT_wzff.de>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 00:44:36 +0100

On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 12:41:23AM +0100, Antoni Grzymala wrote:
> Sebastian Goll dixit (2010-01-17, 16:44):
>
> > On Sun, 17 Jan 2010 16:24:11 +0100
> > Gregor Best <gbe_AT_ring0.de> wrote:
> >
> > > Same thing with every other screen locker. The only "solution" is to
> > > remove the ChangeVT* mappings from the xmodmap.
> >
> > Another solution seems to be to exec into “startx” instead of running
> > it within a shell. Then, there is no C-z to send it into background.
>
> Yet another one is to use xdm.
>
> --
> [a]

or slim. or gdm. or kdm.
Received on Sun Jan 17 2010 - 23:44:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jan 17 2010 - 23:48:03 UTC