Re: [dev] [OFFTOPIC] How to know the size of a process?

From: Charlie Kester <corky1951_AT_comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 13:48:08 -0800

On Sun 24 Jan 2010 at 13:26:56 PST Premysl Hruby wrote:
>On (24/01/10 13:07), Charlie Kester wrote:
>> Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 13:07:14 -0800
>> From: Charlie Kester <corky1951_AT_comcast.net>
>> To: dev_AT_suckless.org
>> Subject: Re: [dev] [OFFTOPIC] How to know the size of a process?
>> List-Id: dev mail list <dev.suckless.org>
>> X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5.20
>> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
>>
>> On Sun 24 Jan 2010 at 09:42:59 PST Premysl Hruby wrote:
>
>Shared libraries are not the only shared memory, look for example at
>dabases (postgres etc) which use enormous blocks of shared memory. Also,
>you can't simply ignore the shared memory even in case of library, that
>would highly underestimate your metering.

Good point.
Received on Sun Jan 24 2010 - 21:48:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jan 24 2010 - 22:00:03 UTC