Pierre Chapuis wrote:
> There is almost no way to avoid name conflicts in OSS projects, I think
> it's the job of the packagers to take care of that in each
> distribution.
totally, yes.
in debian (surf is waiting in the new queue), there's no other package
called surf. so that other surf must be really, really awfully
old/unmaintained/uninteresting that this wasn't even included in debian
earlier.
oiow: if it would my decision, i would stick with it.
> The other project is packaged under the
> name surf-ag. The two packages should conflict because they both
> provide /usr/bin/surf but nobody ever complained about that
rather, surf-ags /usr/bin/surf should be renamed to /usr/bin/surf-ag.
-- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: daniel.baumann_AT_panthera-systems.net Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/Received on Wed Jan 27 2010 - 15:04:06 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jan 27 2010 - 15:24:02 UTC