Re: [dev] [OFFTOPIC] Recommended meta-build system

From: Charlie Kester <>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 13:46:07 -0800

On Mon 01 Feb 2010 at 13:30:00 PST Uriel wrote:
>On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 2:06 PM, anonymous <> wrote:
>>> Having said that, in case of rfork vice versa from FreeBSD.
>> Yes, I am talking about FreeBSD. With configure you can make your
>> program portable between FreeBSD and Linux. Most probably other
>> systems won't implement clone/rfork their own way so program will be
>> portable between all systems with some kind of rfork implementation.
>This is bullshit, one of the reasons I gave up using FreeBSD long ago
>is because so much crap software that used auto*hell would blow up
>when trying to build it on FreeBSD, and trying to fix up auto*hell so
>the damned thing would build was a fucking nightmare.

Perhaps that was a problem "long ago" but it doesn't seem to be a
problem *now*. I've been using FreeBSD since release 7.0 and have never
had a problem with configure.
Received on Mon Feb 01 2010 - 21:46:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Feb 01 2010 - 22:00:04 UTC