On 2/24/10, Jason Ryan <jasonwryan_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> markus schnalke wrote:
>> Maybe one should list all WMs that see dwm as their primary influence.
>
> It points to a deficiency in the way Wikipedia views notability: it is
> quite at odds with the notion of influence and derivation that powers
> free and open source software...
i don't know about the policy of wikipedia but it seems to me it is
full of irrelevant articles
..and i don't see why would that hurt anyone
the dwm article often got out of sync with the project and it had lots
of false info, meanwhile it got translated into 10 languages
for me this shows that it was not the developers who maintained it but
ppl who cared enough
..i thought that's the definition of being a relevant article
anyway i don't really care about that article much, it just seems odd
to me that they want to delete it now
Received on Wed Feb 24 2010 - 10:05:32 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Feb 24 2010 - 10:12:02 UTC