Re: [dev] AfD discussion of dwm Wikipedia article

I think we should try and get wikipedia to delete the article, then get some
well known and "reliable" source to write an article about how dwm was
removed from wikipedia thus making dwm notable.

On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 10:57 AM, <eze.programmer_AT_gmail.com> wrote:

> As you said, it is the first hit and it points to suckless.org
> i could not care less about what an article on wikipedia says about
> dwm, if a potential user reads the article, as long as the reference link
> points to suckless.org its cool with me.
>
> "...and nothing of value was lost"
>
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 08:08:32AM +0000, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > someone pointed me to this:
> >
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Dwm#Dwm
> >
> > I wouldn't recommend to join that discussion there, such appeals
> > usually lead to the deletion. But perhaps someone has more links to
> > second party sources that might convince them to keep the article.
> >
> > As you'll see, I'm neutral to the deletion, we got a wiki ourselves
> > and first hit in Google is dwm.suckless.org when googling for dwm.
> > That's most important ;)
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Anselm
> >
>
>
Received on Wed Feb 24 2010 - 23:46:45 UTC