Re: [dev] sed 10q or sed 11q

From: Jonas Domeij <jonas.domeij_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 00:16:59 +0200

On 11 April 2010 22:00, Szabolcs Nagy <nszabolcs_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> On 4/11/10, markus schnalke <meillo_AT_marmaro.de> wrote:
>> Now I actually must assume, Uriel might be wrong. *eek*
>>
>> But is this possible?
>
> yes
>
>

Or perhaps 11 is more convenient to type than 10...
Received on Sun Apr 11 2010 - 22:16:59 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: anonymous: "Re: [dev] Re: stali and OpenBSD userland etc."
Previous message: Szabolcs Nagy: "Re: [dev] sed 10q or sed 11q"
In reply to: Szabolcs Nagy: "Re: [dev] sed 10q or sed 11q"
Next in thread: anonymous: "Re: [dev] sed 10q or sed 11q"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Apr 11 2010 - 22:24:02 UTC