Re: [dev] dwm-5.8 / dmenu-4.1

On 28 May 2010 20:03, anonymous <aim0shei_AT_lavabit.com> wrote:
> Why config.def.h is not named config.h.def?  Extra "extensions" are
> usually added after existing, like "config.h.bak".
>
> That way it would be possible to write
>
> config.h:
>        @echo creating $@ from $@.def
>        @cp $@.def $@
>
> Or even better (will work if you don't rename it too):
>
> config.h: config.h.def
>        @echo creating $@ from $<
>        @cp $< $@

No.

Can't see a big difference here; apart from that config.def.h has been
the "dwm way" since 0.x times (hence for nearly 4 years now).

Cheers,
Anselm
Received on Fri May 28 2010 - 20:25:45 UTC