Okay sorry, I already asked this before but somehow never got the replys
back and forgot about it.
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Matthew Bauer <mjbauer95_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> Would Mercurial be considered suckless?
>
> I've always wondered why suckless projects use Mercurial instead of the
> standard git for version control that is used by most Linux projects.
>
> Isn't Git more simpler than Mercurial?
>
Received on Thu Jun 10 2010 - 01:13:12 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Jun 10 2010 - 01:24:02 UTC