Re: [dev] Is Mercurial (hg) suckless?

On 09/06/10 Matthew Bauer said:

> Would Mercurial be considered suckless?
>
> I've always wondered why suckless projects use Mercurial instead of the
> standard git for version control that is used by most Linux projects.
>
> Isn't Git more simpler than Mercurial?

more simpler? :)

Git and Hg are very similar. IMHO it makes little difference which one you
use.

Mike

-- 
Michael P. Soulier <msoulier_AT_digitaltorque.ca>
"Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a
touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction."
--Albert Einstein