Re: [dev] Is Mercurial (hg) suckless?

From: Moritz Wilhelmy <>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 19:36:47 +0200

> tla? You must be joking, latest release dates 2006, it's code is
> 150kSLOC (nearly 8 times Mercurial) -- most likely caused by the GNU
> factor (==smoking too much weed) and the interface is completely
> retarded (and always has been).

Uriel mentioned Tom Lord's ranting about svn, so I thought maybe someone still
uses tla. And yes, it's bloated. I'd still prefer it over SVN any minute.
Received on Thu Jun 10 2010 - 17:36:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Jun 10 2010 - 17:48:02 UTC